Field Results

Field Results & Trial Data

Reported results only — from our own road trial, manufacturer road trials, and published dynamometer research. No "expected savings" claims; field evaluation on your own duty cycle remains the only valid commercial basis.

Section A · First-party trial

YBG road trial — 2.0 L turbodiesel SUV, Canberra–Sydney corridor, 2019–20

Operator: YBG Group (our own trial). Vehicle: 2.0 L turbodiesel SUV (brand intentionally not named). Equipment used was an earlier-generation 100 L/hr oxyhydrogen generator, 12 V DC, alkaline-cell type — included here honestly to demonstrate the combustion effect. The systems we ship today are PEM-based (no caustic electrolyte).

Highway: baseline 9.31 L/100km dropped to 6.73 L/100km post-install — a 27.7% improvementover a 292 km return run at ~110 km/h steady cruise.

Urban / mixed: 26.9% improvementover 972.5 km of logged urban driving. The gain was not immediate — it built progressively over roughly 1,000 km, consistent with progressive in-situ carbon cleaning of the combustion chamber and injectors.

Total logged distance: 1556.5 km.

Highway delta
−27.7%
9.31 → 6.73 L/100km
Urban delta
−26.9%
over 972.5 km
Highway distance
292 km
return run @ ~110 km/h
Build-up distance
~1,000 km
progressive carbon cleaning
DateRoutekmLitresL/100km
12 Oct 2019Canberra → Goulburn (hwy)96.08.949.31
12 Oct 2019Goulburn → Sydney (hwy)196.018.259.31
02 Nov 2019Canberra urban (mixed)142.312.809.00
23 Nov 2019Canberra urban (mixed)188.415.408.17
14 Dec 2019Canberra urban (mixed)214.716.107.50
11 Jan 2020Canberra urban (mixed)221.615.006.77
08 Feb 2020Canberra urban (mixed)205.513.506.57
29 Feb 2020Canberra → Sydney (hwy, return)292.019.656.73
Total logged1556.5

Manufacturer test data reports selected fuel-consumption reductions in the 15 – 20% range, reduced carbon accumulation and smoke, and improved combustion stability. Actual results vary materially with engine condition, duty cycle, load profile, fuel quality, installation and operating conditions. Field evaluation is required before commercial projection.

Section B · Manufacturer-reported road trials

Manufacturer road trials — petrol vehicles

Reported by the manufacturer; method note: departure and return runs measured separately and averaged. Vehicle brands intentionally not named.

Trial 1
1.6 L petrol sedan — 156 hp
Baseline7.2 L/100km
Post-install (avg dep/ret)6.1 L/100km
Reported improvement−15.6%
Trial 2
2.0 L turbocharged petrol — 200 hp
Baseline9.9 L/100km
Post-install (avg dep/ret)8.4 L/100km
Reported improvement−15.0%

Manufacturer test data reports selected fuel-consumption reductions in the 15 – 20% range, reduced carbon accumulation and smoke, and improved combustion stability. Actual results vary materially with engine condition, duty cycle, load profile, fuel quality, installation and operating conditions. Field evaluation is required before commercial projection.

Section C · Published research

Dynamometer study — El-Kassaby et al. (2016)

El-Kassaby, M., Eldrainy, Y. A., Khidr, M. E., & Khidr, K. I. (2016). Effect of hydroxy (HHO) gas addition on gasoline engine performance and emissions. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 55(1), 243–251.

Context: small spark-ignition test engine at steady dynamometer load using an alkaline cell. Most relevant to steady-load duty cycles such as generator sets; results are not a prediction for any specific engine.

16202428320.51.01.52.02.53.0Brake power (kW)Brake thermal efficiency (%)Gasoline (baseline)HHO-assisted
Adapted from El-Kassaby, Eldrainy, Khidr & Khidr (2016), Alexandria Engineering Journal 55(1) 243–251. Redrawn in site style; values approximated from the published figure for illustration. Small spark-ignition test engine at steady dynamometer load using an alkaline cell.

Manufacturer test data reports selected fuel-consumption reductions in the 15 – 20% range, reduced carbon accumulation and smoke, and improved combustion stability. Actual results vary materially with engine condition, duty cycle, load profile, fuel quality, installation and operating conditions. Field evaluation is required before commercial projection.

Variability

Measure it on your fleet.

Results vary materially with engine condition, duty cycle, load profile, fuel quality, installation and operating conditions. The only valid commercial basis is a controlled field evaluation on your own vehicles or gensets.

Related expert article: Thermal efficiency and hydrogen-assisted combustion — what the data shows.